Copy Handler Community Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
February 07, 2012, 04:20:02 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
SMF - Just Installed!
333 Posts in 116 Topics by 459 Members
Latest Member: Prc2G9rge
* Home Forum Help Search Login Register
+  Copy Handler Community Forum
|-+  CH Support
| |-+  General support
| | |-+  File Acceleration over LAN?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: File Acceleration over LAN?  (Read 7430 times)
Savage1701
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 1


View Profile
« on: August 09, 2008, 02:50:31 PM »

Will this utility accelerate copying of files over a gigabit LAN network?  I specifically transfer large DV and backup files in the 10-40GB range.  Thanks for any help.
Logged
PolarBear2k
Newbie
*

Karma: +1/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 3


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 05, 2008, 07:45:09 PM »

Based on my usage, it is faster than basic Windows copy/paste. Not to mention the array of additional features.

What I want to know is what would be the optimal setting in terms of buffer size when transferring over a Gigabit LAN connection to a NAS?

Thanks
Logged
Ixen
Administrator
Full Member
*****

Karma: +5/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 121



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 25, 2009, 11:36:11 PM »

I am afraid that you must perform some testing yourself to set the appropriate buffer size (it would very much depend on the kind of data you will copy (small vs large files)).
Logged
PolarBear2k
Newbie
*

Karma: +1/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 3


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 16, 2009, 04:17:09 AM »

Based on your testing and experience what are the best settings for transferring large files vs many small files? Maybe adding a setting and let the user choose would be a good idea.

Thanks
Logged
Ixen
Administrator
Full Member
*****

Karma: +5/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 121



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 23, 2009, 09:15:34 PM »

It's really hard to say. I was testing the performance last weekend and it varied. When I copied between standard hdd and ssd drive and it seemed that the best performance was available with enabled buffering and buffer size of 128kB. You may try this combination, but be aware that it may not be optimal for your usage.
Logged
Koffer
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 4


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: September 01, 2010, 08:34:22 AM »

wow, only 128k. I setup to 2M for network.

Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.14 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.05 seconds with 20 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.008s, 2q)